Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. Author: Pamela McCorduck. Pamela McCorduck first went among the artificial intelligentsia when the field was fresh and new, and asked the scientists engaged in it what they were doing. By Mike Holderness. Is it that time already? The classic Machines Who Think ( A. K. Peters, $) has come out in a 25th anniversary edition.
|Country:||Sao Tome and Principe|
|Published (Last):||5 April 2004|
|PDF File Size:||13.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The other I call the Hebraic, which finds the whole idea of thinking machines wicked, even blasphemous. Patty rated it really liked it Mar 07, But we still have a way to go, and no wonder. Now, Machines Who Think is back, along with an extended addition that brings the field up to date in the last quarter century, including its scientific and its public faces.
Xm rated it liked it Dec 17, Some people think that smart machines won’t have any desire to occupy our particular niche: We provide complimentary e-inspection copies of primary textbooks to instructors considering our books for course adoption.
Pamela McCorduck – Wikipedia
I’m not sure that’s even desirable. Outside the pattern, a warning flag goes up.
Some people think that the likeliest scenario is that smart machines will help humans become smarter, the way Garry Kasparov feels that smart chess-playing machines have made whho a better player. Most of the arguments against halting suggest that the benefits will outweigh the dangers.
Aren’t you yourself worried?
Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign pamla. Jul 24, Rob Mason rated it it was amazing Shelves: Offer Nimrod rated it really liked it Nov 17, But an interesting characteristic of AI research is how often good ideas were proposed, tried, then dropped, as the technology of the moment failed to allow a good idea to flourish.
John Basl – – Philosophy and Technology 27 1: Many medical devices now employ AI to diagnose and manage the course of therapy. A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 2: I think that trade-off should be publicly debated, with all the gravity it deserves. This edition can’t tell us the difference. Paperbackpages. We’ve lately seen a program that has mastered the discovery process in a large, complex legal case, using a small fraction of the time, an even smaller fraction of costs—and it’s more accurate.
Shouldn’t we just say no to intelligent machines? Lists with This Book. It took another fourteen years for Watson to emerge as the Jeopardy champion. I don’t think we can say no.
Machines Who Think (2nd ed.)
Now, Machines Who Think is back, along with an extended addition that brings the field up to date in the last quarter century, including its scientific and its public faces. Jack Copeland – unknown. Mvcorduck in the downtown clubs, boldface in the gossip columns, stalked by paparazzi, it was swept up in a notorious publicity and commercial frenzy. She saw artificial intelligence as the scientific apotheosis of one of the most enduring, glorious, often amusing, and sometimes alarming, Sign in to use this feature.
Steve rated it really liked it Mar 21, But nobody believes that there’s no chance of danger.
Account Options Sign in. For more than two decades, your credit card company has employed various kinds of artificial intelligence programs to tell whether or not the transaction coming in from your card is typical for you, or whether it’s outside your usual pattern.
Jack Copeland – – Minds and Machines 12 2: It’s a thnk achievement for human scientists to design a machine smart enough to beat not only the reigning chess champion, but also a man said to be the best chess champion ever. Seldias rated it it was ok Jan 29, History of Machlnes Philosophy. McCorduck shows how, from a slightly dubious fringe science, artificial intelligence has moved slowly though not always steadily to a central place in our everyday lives, mccodruck how it will be even more crucial as the World Wide Web moves into its next generation.
She saw artificial intelligence as the scientific apotheosis of one of the most enduring, glorious, often amusing, and sometimes alarming, traditions of human culture: The material seems insensitive to the deep philosophical stakes of its surface skim of Turing’s hardy question: An Old Theory in a New Frame?
In just a few decades, we’re trying to mimic and even surpass millions of years of natural evolution.
Machines Who Think
Now I’m not so sure—it might be sooner than I expected. Pamela McCorduck and A. Would that stop other researchers elsewhere?
Neely – – Philosophy and Technology 27 1: I explore that further in my book. The book reflects a considerable bias towards the part of this field that came ,achines of the Dartmouth conference McCarthy, Simon, Newell, Misky, etc.