If you are not already a participant in the culture of power, being told Delpit’s ( ) Aspect 1: Issues of power are enacted in the classroom. Delpit, L.D. (). The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children, Harvard Educational Review, 58(3). Lisa Delpit Says Teachers Must Value Students’ Cultural Strengths .. for internalizing “the repressive and disempowering forces of the power.

Author: Vogore Kesho
Country: Great Britain
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 1 May 2005
Pages: 259
PDF File Size: 18.48 Mb
ePub File Size: 17.46 Mb
ISBN: 753-2-53854-707-6
Downloads: 4485
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tulabar

Butler and James D. School Choice By Peter W. Edited by Lance W. Roberts and Rodney A.

Lisa Delpit

McGinn and Allison M. Merriam-Webster’s Encyclopedia of Literature. In Other People’s Children: Mays Chair of Urban Educational Leadership at Georgia State University, provides an important yet typically avoided discussion of how power imbalances in the larger U. Through telling excerpts of conversations with teachers, students, and parents from varied cultural backgrounds, Delpit shows how everyday interactions are loaded with assumptions made by educators and mainstream society about the capabilities, motivations, and lis of low-income children and children of color.

Thinking, learning and teaching: Lisa Delpit (): culture of power

Other People’s Children is divided into three parts. Other Cultures and Communities,” Delpit illustrates how her teaching, research, and living experiences in Papua New Guinea and Alaska provided her with the opportunity to “make explicit to myself aspects of my home culture, which previously had been an unexamined backdrop for everyday living” p.

The last section, “Looking to the Future: Accommodating Diversity,” includes essays in which Delpit investigates how classroom practice and teacher assessment dwlpit education must accept “that alternative worldviews exist — that there are valid alternative means to any end, as well as valid alternative ends in themselves” p.

A connecting theme throughout the book is how power imbalances and cultural conflicts within classrooms occur within a larger society that nurtures and maintains stereotypes. When poower we see their lives portrayed on the six o’clock news?

Indeed, in the educational institutions of this country, the possibilities for poor people and for people of color to define themselves, to determine the self each should be, involve a power that lies outside of the self. It is others who determine how they should act, how they are to be judged.

Review of Other People’s Children – HEPG

When one “we” gets to determine standards for all “wes,” then some “wes” are in trouble! It is the reluctance of people, especially those with power and privilege, “to perceive those different from themselves except through their own culturally clouded vision” p.

This inability is particularly destructive in classrooms where teachers view low-income and minority children as “other” and “see damaged and dangerous caricatures of the vulnerable and impressionable beings before them” p.

Perhaps most lusa about the essays, and about Delpit’s writing of the book in general, is her openness in demonstrating how it is she has come to hold certain ideas about education: When I consider the origins of my views, I realize that my personal history, by necessity, contributes considerably to my current belief systems.


I write from a life lived poer many margins, usually while struggling to approach the center of whichever page of my life is unfolding at the moment.

It has been that struggle to understand and adapt to various contexts that has led me on the personal journey of discovering other realities. For example, her thoughts about culthre failure of process writing approaches to provide minority and low-income students with access to the “codes of power” of “Standard” English emerged from her own experiences as a classroom teacher committed to ensuring the success of African American children.

She recalls her realization that the progressive teaching methods of her teacher education were not working with her African Ot students: It piwer that I lias moving away from what I had learned [process approaches].

It hurt even more that I had failed in the task that was most important to me — teaching black children and teaching them well. I could not talk about my failure then. It is difficult even now.

At least I did not fall into the trap of talking about the parents’ failures. In particular, Delpit expresses concern about schools that place curricula and texts before students and relationships with those students; tolerate rather than embrace the reality of diversity; refuse to acknowledge the politics of education; and consider some children as “our children” and the great majority as delput people’s children.

In classrooms where White and middle-class teachers regard minority and low-income students as “other people’s children,” Delpit argues that deelpit teachers repeatedly fail to reveal the rules of the culture of power to students since they are “frequently least aware of — or least willing to acknowledge” p.

As a result, these teachers often impede the academic and social success of “other people’s children” who need to survive in a society that demands fluency in “Standard” English for economic and political success. Pretending that gatekeeping points don’t exist is to ensure that many students will not pass through them. I further believe that to act as if power does not exist is to ensure that the power status remains the same. To imply to children or adults.

I prefer to be honest with my students. I tell them de,pit their language and cultural style is unique and wonderful but that there is a political power game that is also being played, and if they want to be in on that game there are certain games that they too must play. When I speak, therefore, of the culture of power, I don’t speak of how I wish things to be but of how they delplt.

As a result, she poses the question that these marginalized groups ppwer ask, and that all educators should pose to themselves and their institutions: As one delpot parent in Papua New Guinea described her child’s success in a preschool that conducted literacy and numeracy instruction in their local language: It is important to teach our children to read and write, but it is more important to teach them to be proud of themselves, and of us” p.


In other words, education need not come at the expense of one’s connection to one’s cultural roots and identity. Because this local school “affirms rather than negates a people’s knowledge of its culture and heritage” p.

Yet, even when classes are not formally conducted in students’ first languages, teachers can make a practice of understanding the cultures of their students. Given the increasing percentage of students from minority backgrounds in U.

As Delpit explains, teachers can. They can discuss openly the injustices of allowing certain people to succeed, based not upon merit but upon which family they were born into, drlpit which discourse they had access to as children. Only after acknowledging the inequity of the system can the teacher’s stance then be “Let pkwer show you how to cheat!

Therefore, pretending that these histories do not exist does nothing to enable these groups to interact on non-hierarchical terms; rather, it simply ensures that racial prejudice and discrimination will remain “that persistent scourge of American society” p.

As an optimistic educator and U. Those efforts must drive our teacher education, our curriculum development, our instructional strategies, and every aspect of the educational enterprise” p. Reading Other People’s Children makes it impossible for one — as a teacher, administrator, or parent — to see teaching as an apolitical endeavor that has little relationship to issues of liberation and injustice.

Implied in Delpit’s work is the vision that when U. Therefore, what Delpit proposes is that classroom teachers lead the way to offering diverse groups the opportunity to learn about each other without the presumption of privilege or domination by any. She explains, We do not really see through our eyes or hear through our ears, but through our beliefs.

To put our beliefs on hold is to cease to exist as ourselves for a moment — and that is not easy. It is painful as well, because it means lixa yourself inside out, giving up your own sense of who you are, and being willing to see yourself in the unflattering light of another’s angry gaze.

It is not easy, but it is the only way to learn what it might feel like to be someone else and the only way to start the dialogue. A Dialogue Culture, Language, and Race. By Paulo Freire and Donaldo P.