GOD IN THE AGE OF SCIENCE PHILIPSE PDF

God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason is a book by the Dutch philosopher Herman Philipse, written in English and published in the. Given, however, that we are living in the age of science, Philipse argues that the natural theologian is faced with a dilemma he calls “The. God in the Age of Science?: A Critique Of Religious Reason. by. Herman Philipse . Philipse tackles religion from an epistemilogical point of view whereas most.

Author: Tugis Donos
Country: Senegal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 14 July 2005
Pages: 429
PDF File Size: 8.19 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.99 Mb
ISBN: 326-3-47220-948-3
Downloads: 20123
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vir

Geoffrey Cumberlege, Oxford University Press, His Atheist Agee was republished in an expanded edition in with a foreword by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who partly credits the book for her shift from Islam to atheism. Lists with This Book.

God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason – Oxford Scholarship

Bibliographic Information Print publication date: Oct 06, Joshua Centanni rated it it was ok Shelves: After explaining their positions, he points to the fallacies in their arguments.

Jan 19, Dennis rated it it was amazing Shelves: No trivia or quizzes yet. Perhaps too academic for most. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. No keywords specified fix it. Oxford Scholarship Online This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online – view abstracts and keywords at book and chapter level.

Moreover, even without any predictions capable of distinguishing competing hypotheses, one can have an intelligent discourse on ways to unify the same phenomena under different explanatory frameworks, but far more subtle work on this topic was done in the sciehce century by John Wisdom’s “Parable of the Invisible Gardener,” by subsequent commentaries and the development of the philosophy of perception, which Philipse does not refer to at all.

Philipse deals with this argument early, but as a justification this keeps coming up in Swinburne’s inductive argument. Preview — God in the Age of Science? Scienec the real concern is the answer to the third dilemma, with Richard Swinburne’s cumulative inductive case for the existence of God taken as the paradigmatic example of how one ought to approach God in the age of science.

  IOMEGA STORCENTER PX4-300R PDF

God Is Not Great God: Kirk marked it as to-read Mar 26, Request removal from index. CS1 Dutch-language sources nl Articles needing additional references from July All articles needing additional references. First, a serious examination of natural theology usually presupposes, or takes a view or presents some case for a particular understanding of causation, which alone gives us access to knowledge of remote forces and agents of any kind.

Search my Subject Specializations: It’s a tough question to answer. To sfience insight in how a religious person substantiates the existence of GodPhilipse presents a “religious decision tree ” that leads to four categories of theists. A Critique of Religious Reason Herman Philipse A powerful response to philosophical attempts to justify religious belief Engages head-on with Richard Swinburne and other leading philosophers of religion Original and elegant arguments; written in a clear and accessible style.

God in the Age of Science? – Hardcover – Herman Philipse – Oxford University Press

Find it on Scholar. Philipse acknowledges this point indirectly by citing Stephen Jay Gould to the effect that “‘almost every interesting event of life’s history’ is a matter of historical contingency,” a conclusion that, though contested, cannot easily be dismissed because of the difficulty of predicting what living things will evolve from particular fod conditionsfn.

The main options may be presented as the end nodes of a decision gox for religious believers.

The main strategies may be presented as conforming to the end nodes of a decision tree for a believer. Not the worst either. Generally speaking, one can divide religious critique into two categories. Given this sweeping conclusion, the variety of religious beliefs, and phlipse history of arguments about theism, one would therefore expect a massive volume tue a vast range of topics, but in practice much of this book is a more focused critique of the arguments offered by Richard Swinburne.

Finally, should religious belief require evidential support, then ought that support be assessed by the same criteria that we use in evaluating evidence in science, or not? Classical, Early, and Medieval World History: Physicists, at least, do not consider it nonsensical to enquire into such matters.

  DATASHEET 74LS151 PDF

The Rationality of Natural Theology 6. Emon, Matthew Levering, and David Novak. Oxford University Press, Languages Nederlands Edit links. Using a ‘strategy of subsidiary arguments’, Philipse concludes 1 that theism cannot be stated meaningfully; 2 that if theism were meaningful, it would have no predictive power concerning existing evidence, so that Bayesian arguments cannot get started; and 3 that if the Bayesian cumulative case strategy did work, one should conclude that atheism is more probable than theism.

Philipse is a big fan of probability calculus, false dichotomies and dismissing opinions that differ from his. If cthis can be done by e methods completely unlike those used by scientists and scholars, or f like those methods. The Probability of Theism David marked it gos to-read May 26, The Book of Job raises the same issue and with great subtlety.

God in the Age of Science?

Harrington, Sacra Pagina Liturgical Press, The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History1st ed. Godd Neary rated it really liked it Feb 21, A Critique of Religious Reason. In his philosophical work, Philipse defends a non-reductionist naturalism, akin to that of Gilbert Ryle, Peter Strawson, and P.

Philipse provides a careful, rigorous, and original critique of theism in the world today. It is unfortunate that critiques of the utility of religion are taken as the reason for critiques phiipse the truth Generally speaking, one can divide religious critique into two categories.

The exercise begins by seeing whether Swinburne is successful in casting God as a successful theory in the way scientific theories are. Views Read Edit View history.

Theism as a Theory 7. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.